Skip to main content

Home Automation: HomeEasy + xPLMonkey

Update 4th March '08: Mal Lansell (the xPL guru) commented!...check out the update to the xPL site with a dedicated HomeEasy page - excellent stuff Mal!

I've been involved with Home Automation to some degree over the last few years. I've dabbled with zWave and installed a small home network to some success. zWave is a good technology - its mesh networking capability and bi-directional signalling is superb but the chronic lack of devices and support in the UK has really crippled its success and with it my enthusiasm for it.

However, a new DIY project (fitting a new kitchen) meant an opportunity for more automation and by pure coincidence I happened upon the HomeEasy range of automation products that B&Q stock. They had exactly the things I needed to automate the kitchen under cupboard lights and kickboard L.E.Ds - a wireless PIR sensor and sockets and all at a very good price, the starter kit (3 sockets + remote) was £20 and the PIR about £11. Now when I walk into the kitchen from dusk to dawn the lights automatically switch on and switch themselves off 1 minute after leaving the room (this can be set on the PIR to 5s, 60s, 5m, 10m)...perfect!

I can recommend the HomeEasy range if you want a simple, cheap automation system that is easy to setup. I've had the odd situation where one of the sockets does appear to not receive the power off command from the PIR but its pretty rare - possibly related to the battery power in the PIR. There are plenty of fancy switches, remotes and even an outdoor specific range. The "ultimate" range even boasts SMS integration with a special base station that can convert SMS messages sent from your mobile to commands beamed around your house!

What is missing is PC integration, however - this is where xPLMonkey appears to fit in. I say appears as I've not been tempted to try this myself but the xPL site mentions support for the HomeEasy range. Using USB tranmitters (transceivers?) connected to a PC you can control HomeEasy receivers - eg: send commands to switch them on/off/dim. xPLMonkey acts as an abstraction layer to convert scripting commands into wireless automation commands. There is even support for MediaCenter!

So if you want to start your wireless home automation somewhere then HomeEasy seems like a decent and cheap enough place to start - xPLMonkey can sate in the inner geek in you if you want to take things further and combine automation with your PC - this obviously opens up more interaction possibilities like web control.

Another range that offers almost identical automation products is DomiaLite - very similar to HomeEasy (or rather HomeEasy is similar to DomiaLite as I think this was around first). Domia offers PC/Web integration with a dedicated controller unit but I think there is a subscription fee involved. Worth a look though....

If you do get HomeEasy working with xPLMonkey then drop me a line - I'm curious to hear about your experience with it!

Comments

Anonymous said…
I've updated my site - there is more information on HomeEasy

http://www.xplmonkey.com/homeeasy.html

HTH

Mal
Unknown said…
Mal - thanks for the update. I read the page and was interested to learn the technical info behind HomeEasy, particularly the duel control protocols especially about the HE200 controller (I have one!). The HomeEasy forum has a post (http://forum.homeeasy.eu/viewtopic.php?t=3) that refers to an upgrade to the HE200 arriving in March 2008 to fix the compatibility with the Ultimate range so I assume that this will also use the HE protocol too.
Anonymous said…
I am a fan of home easy devices.
i can also control all my devices via the web. I use a website called http://www.unitehomedevices.com . All you need is a USB dongle, which the sell .

Full home automation is the future.
And it’s about the energy savings you will enjoy by assigning your home the responsibility of regulating the operation of lights, water heater, HVAC system, entertainment components, appliances and irrigation system so these devices are on only when needed.

Popular posts from this blog

Walk-Thru: Using Wolfpack to automatically deploy and smoke test your system

First, some history... The advent of NuGet has revolutionised many many aspects of the .Net ecosystem; MyGet, Chocolatey & OctopusDeploy to name a few solutions building upon its success bring even more features to the table. I also spotted that NuGet could solve a problem I was having with my OSS System Monitoring software Wolfpack ; essentially this is a core application framework that uses plugins for extension ( Wolfpack Contrib ) but how to unify, standardise and streamline how these plugins are made available? NuGet to the rescue again - I wrapped the NuGet infrastructure (I deem NuGet to be so ubiquitous and stable that is has transcended into the software "infrastrucuture" hall of fame) with a new OSS project called Sidewinder . Sidewinder allows me to wrap all my little extension and plugins in NuGet packages and deploy them directly from the Wolfpack application - it even allows me to issue a new version of Wolfpack and have Wolfpack update itself, sweet huh

Configuration in .Net 2.0

11-Dec-2007 Update I've updated this post to fix the broken images and replaced them with inline text for the example xml and accompanying C# code. This post has been by far the most hit on this blog and along with the comments about the missing images I thought it was time to update it! Whilst recreating the examples below I zipped up the working source code and xml file and loaded this onto my Project Distributor site - please download it to get a full working custom configuration to play with! Just click on the CustomConfigExampleSource link on the right hand side, then the "Source" link to get the zip. We are in the process of converting our codebase to .Net 2.0. We've used Enterprise Library to great effect so decided that we should continue with this in the form of the Jan 2006 release which targets 2.0 and I've got the job of porting our Logging, Data Access etc wrappers to EntLib 2.0. ...And so far so good - the EntLib docs aren't bad and the migrati

Castle/Windsor schema enables Visual Studio intellisense

There has been a lot of noise recently about Inversion of Control (IoC) with .Net recently (stop sniggering at the back java guys!).... I've been using IoC via the Spring.NET framework for over 2 years now - it's a completely different approach to coding and once you get your head around it everything just falls into place and development is a real joy again. As I mention, Spring.NET is my framework of choice but a recent change in employer has seen me bump up against Castle/Windsor . First impressions are that I like it - it's not as powerful or feature rich as Spring but that's not always a bad thing! The one thing I did miss though was Visual Studio intellisense when editing the configurations - Spring has an online schema that can be associated with a Spring configuration. This got me thinking - if the VS intellisense can be hooked into that easily why not create one for Windsor configuration? So I did...you can download it from my new google code site here . Remem